Arguing That Cats and Dogs Are Better Than Dogs

Arguing That Cats and Dogs Are Better Than DogsHow does the argumentative essay on cats and dogs compare to the argumentative essay on dogs and cats? The similarities between the two arguments are striking. They have similar themes and similar issues, although the specifics of the arguments may be very different.In both essays, there is an assumption that dogs and cats are 'better' than people. Of course, this is not always true. Some dogs and cats are cute and fun, but others are mischievous and destructive. For those who choose to argue that cats and dogs are better than dogs, they must answer the question, 'how do I know which is better?'Some people argue that dogs and cats are more closely related to each other because of their physical characteristics, such as the long, dense fur of a house cat, and the short, wide coat of a large, wild dog. Others argue that dogs and cats are more similar to each other because they have been domesticated through hundreds of years of careful bre eding. Yet another group argues that dogs and cats are more similar to each other because the genes for both are close to each other.The first group argues that the genes for physical features like fur color and shape are more closely related to one another than genes for other things like intellect, intelligence, and temperament. The second group argues that humans and other primates, like chimps and gorillas, are more similar genetically than with other animals like dogs and cats. The third group argues that dogs and cats are more similar to each other than the differences between dogs and cats, as indicated by the rules of natural selection, are. These individuals assert that dogs and cats share more genes with chimpanzees and gorillas than with other animals.Of course, many animals live in the same environment as humans do. The point of an argumentative essay is to show how these animals could be improved by human intervention. Dogs and cats may not have been domesticated throug h hundreds of years of selective breeding, but they are certainly considered 'domesticated' today. It is their natural state.Another general point made by some critics of the argument that cats and dogs are better than dogs is that each of these species has been treated better than the other. Humans have domesticated some animals, but they have not treated others. This could explain why some animals are better than others.Of course, if these creatures are so 'better' that they have not been domesticated, then common sense would tell us that they should be treated as humans treat their fellow man. Does the argument that cats and dogs are better than dogs work in this scenario? Of course not. Both animals are still wild animals. They are no better or worse than anyone else.A more in-depth look at the argument that cats and dogs are better than dogs is one that considers the obvious differences between cats and dogs. This includes the fact that dogs are social animals that take in chil dren as part of their territory. Cats, on the other hand, are solitary animals that tend to stay alone.